Wednesday, 21 March 2012

My reply to the "Angry Arab News Service"



I am not going to respond here to As’ad AbuKhalil's liberal digs about me being a "fan" of dictatorships in regards to my efforts to give a platform to the Libyan and Syrian majority voices that support their leaders that have come under vicious attack by imperialism.


If Khalil would care to put down Britain's most liberal pro-war rag, the Guardian, for answers about me, and take a second to look more deeply into why I do the work that I do, he might find them here, here and here.


The first link answers his confusion about some of the interviews I gave when I was in the Rixos. In regards to the "guards" he refers to, some of whom had been my friends who had helped me and other journalists with our work up until NATO bombed the rebels into Tripoli - all of them were civilian volunteers, including students, academics and other civilian residents in Tripoli. When NATO bombed the rebels into Tripoli, they like many other people in the capital, picked up the weapons that they had been trained to use during the crisis to defend their capital. But if you had been only following mainstream western and GCC media, you wouldn't know anything about the hundreds and thousands of people who volunteered to defend their country and Leader, who NATO also viewed as legitimate targets of their bombs. And as for the volunteers who were defending the area around the Rixos, I still have contact with the ones who are alive. 


I personally was not being prevented from leaving the Rixos by any volunteer, and I could have left at any point I wanted if I wanted to risk being hit by shrapnel or in crossfire, but I didn't and so I stayed in the Rixos, where contrary to reports that we were running out of food and water, the volunteers were bringing us supplies not to mention that all of the mini bars in the nearly 200 room luxury hotel were fully stocked, providing ample liquids for the 35 or so of us. Myself and a few others with the help of the volunteers even went into the Rixos kitchen and cooked a hot meal for all of the journalists. 


I was in contact with others in Tripoli whenever the phones were working, including foreign diplomats, who were all in the same position as us and couldn't leave their homes or offices for at least five days because it was too dangerous, not because they were being held hostage.


It is a shame that Khalil continues to use only those media that were part of the essential war propaganda against Libya and now Syria to get his information to try to undermine my work against imperialism's latest plots.


It is interesting that he mentions how defending Cuba is more understandable than defending Libya or Syria. Well, perhaps Khalil should look more into the positions of Castro and other leaders from progressive Latin America on Libya and Syria, who clearly regard both Gaddafi and Assad as comrades.

3 comments:

  1. Mr. AbuKhalil is in the USA. His function, like noted “leftist” and “progressive” personalities in Europe, is to infiltrate genuinely anti-imperialist groups and twist their naïve members into supporting imperialist wars. In Europe the fiercest warmongers and imperialists are people who (like Mr. AbuKhalil) call themselves “Marxist-Leninist,” “anarchist", “feminist,” and so on. They target anyone who opposes imperialist conquest, and condemn them as “fascists,” “far right,” “pro-terrorist,” and so on. They are >PAID< by their respective governments to do this. Their ostensive support for Palestinians is mere camouflage. They are the intellectual equivalent of police department agents provocateurs at genuine protest marches. Mr. AbuKhalil himself is from Tyre, a stronghold of the infamous pro-Israel, pro-GCC, pro-imperialist March 14 Alliance (especially its “Future Movement”). Like the GCC oil sheiks, he is more Zionist than are militant Zionist Jews (although he calls himself an “anti-Zionist”). If I had more space here, I would dissect many of his self-contradictions, and expose him for the pathetic lying fool he is. Apologies for my harshness, Lizzie, but he disgusts me, and his baseless attacks on you are especially offensive.

    ReplyDelete
  2. my email letters to angry on some fudging of his:

    letter 1:
    Hello
    Re your post;

    'Is it not hilarious that those folks are fans of Saddam while they are opposing the repressive Syrian Ba`thist regime?'

    http://angryarab.blogspot.com.au/2012/03/salafite-and-syrian-opposition-protest.html
    Ironically saddams 'regime' was more inclusive than the current one…so he was not so bad.

    How exactly is the syrian government repressive? Especially when most syrians support it. Assad is very popular in Syria and with many syrians abroad

    http://lizzie-phelan.blogspot.com.au/2012/04/students-from-homs-thank-syrian.html
    http://australiansforsyria.wordpress.com

    Narwani gives us a look at events in Idlib, which shows us why the above students thanked the syrian army!
    http://english.al-akhbar.com/blogs/sandbox/hollywood-homs-and-idlib
    If the repression is so common, why did Reuters need to send this video around the world in 2011?
    http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/s3218415.htm

    Note the comments.


    Regards
    Brian
    -----------------

    Letter 2:
    Hi Angry,

    HRW has not the best reputation when it comes to unbiased investigation of events in the middle east/north africa. But the following is absurd even by those standards!

    http://angryarab.blogspot.com.au/2012/03/human-rights-watch-some-reports.html

    SO

    Al-Qusayr
    "Eighteen witnesses from al-Qusayr, including an international journalist who stayed there from March 8 to 15, 2012, described shelling by the security forces, attacks on fleeing residents, and sniper fire at residents. Their accounts reflect similar tactics used by government forces in Idlib and Homs previously documented by Human Rights Watch, suggesting a coordinated policy of abuse." (thanks Nadim)
    Posted by As'ad AbuKhalil
    http://angryarab.blogspot.com.au/2012/03/al-qusayr.html
    Lets see what the people of HOMS think:
    http://lizzie-phelan.blogspot.com.au/2012/04/students-from-homs-thank-syrian.html

    As for Idlib:
    http://english.al-akhbar.com/blogs/sandbox/hollywood-homs-and-idlib

    This is Libya mark 2! Where the local support for their govt and army were ignored by paternalistic foreigners.
    When demonising an independent government, its been found helpful if the bellwether left sides against the target govt. This is the basis of colour revolutions.
    As for international journalist..who is that? The international press as with Libya has lied 24/7 about syria….The 'free' press has ceased to exist with regard to imeprial backed insurgencies.

    Regards
    Brian


    Angry is lebanese-american not syrian or libyan...and his knowledge of both seems woeful.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Lizzie I have been following your comments for a while and I am amazed at your bravery, sensitivity, energy and of course your looks. I do worry about you a lot please be careful don't let your sensitivities take over your instinct about safety.
    I never did understood this Angry Arab guy anyway, ever since reading his visit to Turkey few years back. I suppose he wants Arab countries to be like Turkey. Iranians have a good word to describe him "Garbzadeci" I was searching a place for complementing your work, instead came across this Angry Arab dude comments from your visitors,glad I did, now I know why always felt awkward about his writings.
    Anyway I will never forget about your coverage of Libya all through the sad ending. Take care.
    my regards.

    Tuzeer

    ReplyDelete